![]() If you can only afford to buy one audio app, then I'd probably recommend Wavelab since it also supports excellent CD Mastering built-in. Also, Wavelab does integrate well enough with Acid and Vegas So if you work mainly on 16bit/44khz, and want a lower lwarning curve, SF is for you, but if you want to be ready to work with 24bit/96khz, and won't be bothered with a higher learning curve, then I'd say Wavelab. ![]() Wavelab can also write to CD from that format direct, without having to dither down to 16/44. That means you can you'll be ready for your MOTU, Audiomedia, and whatever 24/96 input cards you have. But for future use, I'd say you'll want the wavelab as you can work on 24bit/96khz while SF is limited to 16 bit. Soundforge will actually be easier to work with, and the quality of both is spot on. ![]() of the Waves bundle but doesn't have VST while Wavelab has both and there are a lot of cool VST plugins. Easier to preview effects in realtime with the wavelab as you have to highlight and use audio plugin chainer to preview in soundforge, SF also has C1, RCL, L1, etc. I Have both and use both of them equally.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |